“To become self-aware, people must be allowed to hear a
plurality of opinions and then make up their own minds. They must be allowed to
say, write and publish whatever they want. Freedom of expression is the most
basic, but fundamental, right. Without it, human beings are reduced to
automatons.”
–Ma Jian

Freedom of speech is the right to express
one’s thoughts publicly and not be punished for doing so. It is legally defined
as “the right to express beliefs and ideas without unwarranted government
restriction (US First Amendment)”. This right has been given to every citizen
in a country, with limitations mentioned in their own laws. Here in the
Philippines, our government is known as democratic and therefore, our right to
the express our thoughts freely is recognized by the law. Unfortunately, within
these past few weeks, tension has been rising due to the issue of the newly
proclaimed law which is known as the Anti- Cyber Crime Law. This law was signed
by the president last September and ever since, many are trying to revoke it.
Protests have been made by many activists, and professional hackers have been
rebelling by hacking into government websites, endangering the government’s
files to be exposed and corrupted. This law, destroys the concept of freedom of speech for the Filipino citizens.
The Anti- Cyber Crime Law**
has been made in order to pursue those who are committing crimes in the online
world. This law is said to include offenses against the confidentiality,
integrity, and availability of computer date system, illegal access, illegal
interception, date interference, system interference and misuse of devices, as
stated by presidential spokesperson Abigail Valte. This law also covers fraud
and identity theft, cybersex, pornography and unsolicited commercialization.
The punishments are imprisonment for 6 to 12 years, payment of fines and suing
of libel.
I think that this law was
presented in a blurry manner and the provisions have not been fully clarified
and dissected. This law which may have been formulated in order to protect the
safety of people’s privacy and the safety of their intellectual properties is
understandable but the provisions that have been made are not clearly reviewed
and the punishments given are too oppressive that can be seen as unreasonable,
that can stifle our freedom of expression. It is not properly reviewed because
there are many flaws and there are also contradictory provisions in it. The
manner in which they implemented this law might be the reason why many people
disagree with its execution. Other people might also agree with me since this
law hinders people who are using the internet to fully express themselves. This
goes against the principle of democracy and freedom of speech that our country
is said to have.
This law was supposedly
implemented to stop online crimes. The intention may be reasonable, but the way
the government has implemented it is not very competent; and due to these
flaws, and also through the unity of the people and the media to expose the
defects this law has to offer, the government has decided to reconsider it and
provide revisions, if not the total removal of this law.
***images came from the internet, I do not claim ownership over them
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento